Ethernet Tackles Access,
Aggregation And Transport
By Kamran Sistanizadeh
Published April 2007; Posted August 2007
Abstract:
Which does a better job replacing
SONET/SDH rings in the metro: Ethernet or MPLS?
Throughout the evolution of local and wide area networks, enterprise customers
have been exposed to a variety of service interfaces at different OSI layers—xWDM
(wave division multiplexing) at Layer 1, SONET and Ethernet at Layer 2, MPLS at
Layer 2.5, and of course, the ubiquitous IP at Layer 3. Each of these interfaces
can be appropriate, depending on the customer’s application environment, the
connectivity requirements among various sites and the need for more or less
signaling, control and SLA (service level agreement) management.
Since customer premises networking environments are primarily built on Ethernet
LANs, it would be highly desirable for carriers and service providers to find a
proper combination of access and transport technologies optimized for
transporting Ethernet among geographically dispersed LANs—within either the
customers’ intranet or extranet service domains. Service providers and carriers
require platforms in some parts of their networks that are optimized for
Ethernet access, and in some parts of their network they need platforms that are
optimized for Ethernet transport.
The evolution of Ethernet from the LAN into the access network (e.g., metro
environment) began in earnest in 1999 after standardized Gigabit Ethernet
technology interfaces on switches and routers became readily available. However,
carriers had been deploying SONET since the mid 1980s, for their inter-office
and regional transport backbones, so SONET was the more frequent choice in the
metro. For long haul and for backbones in the core, SONET, ATM (asynchronous
transfer mode), and frame relay ruled until the late 1990s, when MPLS began to
attract more attention from carrier network planners.
Today, Ethernet’s proliferation in the LAN environment, and its ongoing speed
advancements (e.g., 10-Gbps, and soon 40-Gbps/100-Gbps), have carriers
contemplating Ethernet as the technology of choice for replacing SONET and MPLS.
Recent initiatives in the IEEE, IETF and ITU are making changes to Ethernet
aimed at pushing it from the access network into the transport backbone
environment while also providing the operational and network management
strengths and features of SONET/SDH. Ethernet is also being adopted as an
“aggregation” and “backhaul” technology of choice by carriers for consumer
broadband services and cellular data.
|
|||||
Return to Business Communications Review Gold Sponsor Archives |
About the author:
Dr. Kamran Sistanizadeh is cofounder and CTO with Yipes Enterprise Services, Inc., a provider of managed Ethernet services. He has been a leading contributor to various industry Forums (ANSI-T1, ADSL and MEF) and an ardent advocate of Ethernet services for enterprises.
This article is reproduced by special arrangement with our partner, Business Communications Review. |
Please note: By downloading this information, you acknowledge that the sponsor(s) of this information may contact you, providing that they give you the option of opting out of further communications from them concerning this information. Also, by your downloading this information, you agree that the information is for your personal use only and that this information may not be retransmitted to others or reposted on another web site. Please encourage colleagues to download their own copy after registering at http://www.webtorials.com/reg/.