Cisco Catalyst 2960 48TC-L
Cisco Catalyst 2960G-48-TC-L
Cisco Catalyst 3560E-48PD
HP ProCurve 2650
HP ProCurve 3500yl-48G
Nortel BayStack 5510-48T
3Com 5500G-E
Cisco Catalyst 3750G-48PS
Cisco Catalyst C3750E-48PD-F
Ethernet Power Study of Cisco and
Competitive Products
By Cisco Systems
Published 2008; Posted September 2008
Abstract:
For LAN switching customers to better understand the power consumption of Cisco®
Catalyst switches relative to other competitive brands in the market, Cisco
commissioned Miercom to analyze the following nine switches:
|
|
Cisco Catalyst 2960 48TC-L |
|
|
Cisco Catalyst 2960G-48-TC-L |
|
|
Cisco Catalyst 3560E-48PD |
|
|
HP ProCurve 2650 |
|
|
HP ProCurve 3500yl-48G |
|
|
Nortel BayStack 5510-48T |
|
|
3Com 5500G-E |
|
|
Cisco Catalyst 3750G-48PS |
|
|
Cisco Catalyst C3750E-48PD-F |
The power consumption of Cisco Catalyst switches is appreciably lower than that
of comparable competitors. This reduces the total cost of ownership and creates
less CO2, thus giving organizations a smaller carbon footprint.
Webtorials Community: Click here to access the resource
Not yet a member of the community? Click here for your free registration